Global Warming Potential of Inhaled Anesthetics: Application to Clinical Use

The study by Susan M. Ryan, MD, PhD, and Claus J. Nielsen, CSc, investigates the global warming potential (GWP) of inhaled anesthetics—sevoflurane, isoflurane, and desflurane—considering their application in clinical settings. These anesthetics are potent greenhouse gases, and understanding their environmental impact can guide more sustainable medical practices.

Key Findings:

  • GWP Values: Desflurane was found to have the highest GWP, significantly more than sevoflurane and isoflurane. Specifically, the GWP over 20 years (GWP20) for sevoflurane is 349, for isoflurane it is 1401, and for desflurane, it reaches 3714.
  • Use of Nitrous Oxide (N2O): Incorporating N2O with these anesthetics increases their environmental impact substantially, except for desflurane, where it shows a decrease in impact due to lower GWP relative contributions.
  • Clinical Implications: The study underscores the importance of selecting anesthetics with lower environmental impacts and suggests minimizing fresh gas flow rates and avoiding N2O to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in clinical settings.

Recommendations:

  • Anesthetic Choice: Prefer sevoflurane or isoflurane over desflurane due to their lower GWPs.
  • Operational Practices: Reduce fresh gas flows and avoid the use of N2O unless clinically necessary, to mitigate the environmental impact.
File Type: pdf
File Size: 267 KB
Categories: Green Anesthesia Course
Tags: Anaesthetic Agents and Global Warming, Anesthesia and Carbon Footprint, Clinical Anesthesia and Environmental Impact, Environmental Impact of Healthcare, Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Medicine, Healthcare Sector Emissions, Inhalational Anaesthetics, Low Flow Anaesthesia, Nitrous Oxide and Ozone Depletion, Sustainable Healthcare Practices